When should a 'sold without legal warranty' clause be added?

The 'sold without legal warranty' clause is typically added when the seller is unaware of certain conditions or defects of the property. This clause is meant to protect the seller from liability for any issues that may arise after the sale, especially if they have not been made aware of them. By including this clause, the seller is clarifying that they do not guarantee the condition of the property, which is particularly important when they may not have comprehensive knowledge of its state.

In cases where the property is new, there may be warranties provided by builders or developers that would cover defects, so including this clause is generally not necessary. When a buyer requests such a clause, it does not automatically obligate the seller to include it unless there is a specific reason or understanding of the property’s condition. Lastly, an increase in market value does not necessarily relate to the need for this clause, as it pertains more to the seller's awareness of the property's condition rather than its market appraisal. Thus, the correct answer focuses on the seller's lack of knowledge about potential issues with the property.